Discover the Fashion Fluent AI that Helps Retail Brands
Drive Higher Margin & Reduce Returns.
Check out Mapp Fashion now! ›
Our latest posts on digital marketing.
Access to guides, case studies, webinars & more.
Develop your knowledge at your own pace with Mapp learning tools!

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

BLOG

Cracking the Code 2025: Fashion Retail Operating Index Preview

What really separates fashion’s winners from the rest.

Cracking the Code 2025: Fashion Retail Operating Index Preview
Written by Sarah McVittie
VP Marketing @Mapp

Status Quo:

Our 2025 Fashion Retail Operating Index looks at 113 quoted stocks across UK/EU/US and scores them on a size‑aware composite of growth, margin momentum and cash discipline (QH Rank).

The key takeway: The top quoted fashion retailers have grown their revenue since 2019 but profit quality and cash have declined.


The cohort shows revenue +20% and gross margin +2.4pp, yet operating margin –2.9pp and the share of loss‑makers rising from 9.8% to 18.9%. Working‑capital cycles have lengthened and leverage has crept up. In short, for the larger operators, growth is back and it is cash velocity and balance‑sheet discipline not channel mix that separate winners from laggards.

Inside the report you’ll find three board‑level signals that cut through the noise:

  • Cash velocity beats channel mix. Companies that shortened inventory‑to‑cash generally repaired margins faster; those that added days mostly paid for it in markdowns. (We show the relationship and the operators that prove it.)
  • Luxury is bifurcating. Scarcity models continue to compound; the “middle” of luxury is seeing similar difficulties to the “middle” of the mass market segment. We look at the importance of brand power alongside SKU discipline, distribution control and price architecture.
  • Sportswear separation is operational. Sourcing flexibility and cost architecture, more than channels, explain who held gross margin through tariff pulses.

Who is this report for?

These are relevant insights for Retailers making FY26–27 plans. There’s lots of cash left on the table across every part of the product journey. Whether it is in what to buy and how much, supply chains, substitutions, customer experience and returns. Each part of the journey presents opportunities to deliver more efficiency and maintain brand power.

A recent MIT report, “The GenAI Divide. STATE OF AI IN BUSINESS 2025” opens with “Despite $30–40 billion in enterprise investment into GenAI, this report uncovers a surprising result in that 95% of organizations are getting zero return”. Of the top 5 barriers 2 and 3 were: “Model output quality concerns” and “Poor user experience”. To me, it would be interesting to understand how much of those barriers occur due to poor quality and inconsistent data feeding those models.

Many of the areas of margin improvement, particularly with fashion retail, are perfect problems for ML or LLM models to perform well in. But, only if there is excellent quality data that is consistent throughout the business. We would argue that better product data in the language of the customer is the upstream lever that improves sell‑through, experiences, reduces returns and shortens the cash cycle.

That’s the efficiency upgrade most retailers haven’t complete – and our report is showing the urgent need to improve in this field.

Register here to receive the full report shortly: ›